Richard Dolan’s Correspondence with Brian Ruhe about the Grey Aliens

Richard Dolan’s Correspondence with Brian Ruhe about the Grey Aliens

I hosted a Meetup on Jan. 22, 2022 with my Meetup group at: https://www.meetup.com/preparing-for-alien-contact . I talked about my unedited email thread, below with Richard Dolan, a UFO historian. The videos of that meeting are in three parts at: Richard Dolan & Brian Ruhe on the Grey Aliens – Part 1 of 3

Richard Dolan & Brian Ruhe on the Grey Aliens – Part 2 of 3

Richard Dolan & Brian Ruhe on the Grey Aliens – Part 3 of 3

This was our email thread:

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, 9:18 PM Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca> wrote:

Hi Richard,

I’ve been corresponding with Mary Rodwell and she is coming back to do her fourth video with me. I will host her with my Meetup group on Feb. 13th:

https://www.meetup.com/preparing-for-alien-contact

And our YouTube channel is https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0epLENHG-CuQaxqaifEALQ . I listen to you a lot and I’m one of your members. Recently you made two videos mentioning Mary Rodwell. You talked about four views on the aliens and you refer to Mary as “the new age view” which I feel is a bit dismissive as Mary does have an excellent body of evidence and witnesses.

You stated in your recent video with the Christian ufologist, talking about abductions, that you agree with him on the David Jacobs perspective. I am disappointed that you said that. My issue with you and Jacobs is your limited perspectives. Firstly we are speaking about human consciousness not just ‘nuts and bolts craft.” Peoples interactions globally are not all physical. You have no real data to go on with those having encounters (you are an historian). And Jacobs is also a historian who took up hypnosis and considers himself an expert when he has done a few regressions.

I’m with Mary Rodwell and Suzy Hansen on this and I feel that we have to better promote the positive side of the Greys, mantids, etc. Do you ever discuss Suzy Hansen’s work? I believe she has some of the highest value info about the Greys.

Mary wrote that it’s not just about promoting the positive so much as sharing the cases of positive contacts in the FREE data which covers 4,200 cases. No other source has that research, not you nor Jacobs, for example. Mary Rodwell’s perspective is, as a researcher/therapist and the numbers of those that have mentioned their very positive encounters with the GREYS/Zetas etc. Once again this data is in the survey. 4,200 globally supported by the FREE research (Beyond UFO’s) and its all conscious recall by the way, there was no hypnosis involved for the surveys. And that the GREYs are 3rd down the list of ET interactions, first are humanoids and then energy beings.

* 75% of interactions are out of body (not physical)

* 85% of those surveyed had a psycho/ spiritual transformation…

None of the studies globally has this data but it makes it clear that we cannot make any judgment on agendas categorically, other than to realize the jury is out but certainly, significant outcomes is the transformation of the individual.

I am afraid many Ufologists do not realize that a researcher performing hypnosis does not make them therapists. They can only work on a limited understanding of what to ask. Budd Hopkins literally watched how hypnosis was done and decided he could practice. He was an artist, not a therapist and he often created more trauma because he didn’t know how to deal with what was uncovered without the understanding that went with it.

Dr. David Jacobs has had several people very upset by how he worked with them regarding leading questions and there are protocols in professional hypnosis that he did not adhere to. You have to have expertise to know how to lead someone through their experiences.

You have never worked with an experiencer in hypnosis but listened to stories. That doesn’t make you an expert. It is only through deeper work that you can expose that fear of the unknown, which may be what has caused trauma, not what actually happened, which may even be a healing, for example. You’re not equipped to be an authority on this and Mary Rodwell mentioned this to you some years ago. FREE surveys have exposed the truth of what is really going on and the numbers give it real credibility.

I feel that this is one of the biggest issues and it points to the future of ufology and the future of man’s relationship with aliens. I would like to have you on board with us on this view, as you are a great contribution to the field and you hold a high standard of truth and reason in an environment plagued with disinfo and lies.

I invite you to do a video with me on this or at least, please make your own video, clarifying this. You could even invite Suzy Hansen on your show to address this. Her email is ufocusnz@xtra.co.nz .

Thanks Richard!

Brian

cc: Mary Rodwell

cc: Suzy Hansen

 

On 1/11/2022 1:42 PM, Richard Dolan wrote:

Hi Brian, and greetings to Mary and Suzi.

 

Thanks for writing. Okay, a couple of things.

 

First, I hope that Mary and Suzi do not think I automatically seek to dismiss all of their research or conclusions. I do candidly admit here that I am suspicious of many “new age” perspectives and conclusions when it comes to ET contact. While I have not done hypno regression myself on anyone, I have sat in on sessions, and I have spoken to researchers of all types, and certainly done a great amount of reading and study on the matter. I have also spoken to a large number of alleged abductees. That number is certainly more than one hundred. I have no idea what the total is.

 

I am sure this number is lower than Mary’s or Suzi’s, but it’s not trivial. So I do believe I am entitled to my opinion and judgment on the matter of abduction/encounter.

 

I am very familiar with the FREE study. I have two copies of the book and read every word. Which is not easy considering it’s not indexed, which is a shame. And not always well written. And highly polemical at times, definitely not detached. I did read certain chapters in greater detail than others. As I have said and written many times, the methodology of that study leaves quite a bit to be desired. That does not invalidate everything in it, and indeed I used some of the data in my most recent book, but it’s got to be understood that it’s also far from ideal.

 

Whether people discuss their ET experience as “positive” or “negative” is somewhat important, yes, but that is by no means the final word in my view. First of all, cognitive manipulation by these entities is a given. We all know this. They easily manage not only our memories of an event, but our emotional response to it. They clearly know how to generate a “love” emotion in us — something frankly the US military is probably quite good at as well. Manipulating human emotions is becoming a sophisticated science in warfare, and it’s clearly in our interest to remember that other beings may easily have that ability. It certainly would make the abduction process much easier. How logical is it that a person who experiences an abduction by an insect-like entity feels intense love for such a being? Has anyone bothered to wonder about this? Why would someone feel such love?

 

I also believe that initial memories of an event, while important, may not really be entirely trusted. Screen memory is a real thing. All of which makes this subject so very challenging. We are dealing with highly advanced intelligences who clearly have an agenda.

 

I have given this matter as much thought as anyone I know. That doesn’t make me more right than others, but I am not hesitant to express my thoughts at this point. As to why they are here in large numbers at this time, this is what I believe:

 

Our society is transforming itself into something that represents a radical transformation of everything we thought we knew about human civilization. A transhumanist era is approaching, one with highly advanced AI, 5/6G, total surveillance, the development of something akin to a hive mind, loss of economic freedom, and the transformation of human civilization into something akin to an ant colony. This is my “take” on it, at any rate. Essentially, an anti-human technocracy.

 

It is, however, a technocracy that, while it is likely to disempower people individually, will be extremely powerful collectively. That means in terms of technology and destructive capability. I am of the opinion that this rapid transformation has gotten the attention of the local “neighborhood.”

 

The question I ask myself is, are they here in order to infiltrate and stop this process? If so, they are clearly failing. Or perhaps they might infiltrate and just manage things as they think they should? I don’t know the answer but I could see this happening.

 

Judging from the evidence that I have seen, I think we are looking at multiple groups that are here. Some very well may be trying to “help,” as much as they can. But I do believe that there is at least one group, possibly more, that does not think very well of us. There are many days in which I can’t say I blame them. Even so, I don’t think all of the ET groups are benevolent. That doesn’t mean I subscribe necessarily to the idea that they are positively “evil.” Whatever that might mean. Just that they may not give a hoot about our survival and might be happier if we were out of the way.

 

Brian, your comments to me were quite out of line. I am not an armchair amateur as you essentially implied. I have spent twenty five years thinking about this phenomenon. Simply because I don’t regress people doesn’t mean I don’t know what I am talking about. I don’t claim to have the final word, but I am entirely entitled to reason this out as I see fit.

 

It’s true that I haven’t looked at Mary’s or Suzi’s research lately, but I am not averse to doing so. I have, however, read the FREE study, which includes work (I think) by both of them. Plus, I love and adore Barbara Lamb and HAVE read her books — all of them. As well as those by Yvonne, Kathleen, Denise, and other still-living abduction researchers. I know their work — whether or not I agree with their conclusions about what is going on is another matter. There is, after all, room for honest disagreement.

 

Moreover, Brian, and this may come as a surprise to you, the phenomenon of “consciousness” is very important and interesting to me, and something — believe it or not — that I do know a thing or two about. Spirituality as well. Please do not make demeaning assumptions about what you think I know or don’t know.

I wish Mary and Suzi well.

Richard

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, 5:32 PM Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca> wrote:

Thanks Richard!

I appreciate you replying and such a well thought out reply. Please accept my apologies, as you’re right. You do know a lot about consciousness and spirituality. I have watched almost all of your videos so I should have known better. Sorry about that. And, I was making mistaken assumptions about your investigation of hypno regression. Sorry.

I have my hypothesis about the big picture and intent of the aliens, as I describe in my Meetup but I don’t know the truth. I just have a working hypothesis which I am willing to discard with new evidence.

I appreciate your comments about the transhumanist era and the collective hive mind. You write, “The question I ask myself is, are they here in order to infiltrate and stop this process.” I suppose I am a bit more optimistic about it than you, but of course, I just don’t know.

I know four people personally who have had contact with mantids and I’ve done a video with Donna Lynn in LA. She does describe this great love she felt and it does make sense to me. My view is that the mantids are very high in the hierarchy and that they do give great care to life on earth and direct the work of the Greys. As a Theravada Buddhist teacher since 1996, I am influenced by the Buddha’s advice to listen to the wise and be respectful of the wise. It’s bad karma to denigrate the wise. I think this hierarchy is very important for us to try to understand and I trust that form of government more than the reptilian/ globalist form of government, which I believe we have right now. I hope I’m not wrong.

I hope Mary and Suzy can weigh in and respond so I’ll pause here to see if they reply.

If you want to post my email you can. And may I ask for your permission to post your email or quote it in my videos?

You remain a huge influence upon me Richard and I look forward to your future realizations and videos.

Thank you!

Brian

😉

 

——– Forwarded Message ——–

Subject:

Re: Thank you for your reply to me, Suzy and Mary

Date:

Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:52:54 -0500

From:

Richard Dolan <keyholepub@gmail.com>

To:

Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>

CC:

Mary Rodwell <starline@iinet.net.au>, Suzi Hansen <ufocusnz@xtra.co.nz>

 

Hi Brian, I’m just seeing this now, can’t really give a more detailed reply but I always go on the assumption that anything I write could go public at any time. So if you want to use anything I’ve said, that’s fine.

perhaps we can continue this conversation later, I need to go to sleep for now. 🙂 best to all.

Richard

——– Forwarded Message ——–

Subject:

Re: Thank you for your reply to me, Suzy and Mary

Date:

Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:36:07 -0800

From:

Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>

To:

Richard Dolan <keyholepub@gmail.com>

Hi Richard,

I feel a lot better, receiving your email as I was too hard on you. I have learned a great deal from you over many years.

Mary was on the road at the time I emailed you all so I hope she responds to you when she’s available.

In the past two years I have been greatly influenced in a positive direction by Jeff and Suzy Hansen. Jeff is in Vancouver and I’ve hosted about 20 hours of videos with him on our Vancouver UFO channel at

https://www.youtube.com/c/VANCOUVERUFOTV/videos

Jeff is similar to Suzy in that they have both been on the craft and had a life long, good relationship with the Greys. I was hoping you would go more in this direction but you are far better read than myself with a much higher IQ. You are correct, that we can have honest disagreements.

What makes me more optimistic is, I think there is one governmental structure in place, like a federation of planets, where mantids and ancient Greys and tall Greys are administering a long term upgrade to transform homo sapiens sapiens into hybrids of the Greys, who will be more spiritual, telepathic and have “quantum dimensional consciousness,” etc. Due to the law of karma, good and bad plays itself out and this is tolerated by the aliens. Even if there is a culling of billions of people, I think the end result will be a great upgrade with the new humans. I often quote what you said, about our brain size expanding about 40,000 years ago.

I will keep refining my working hypothesis of the ET reality and as Mary says, she is on a melting ice-flow as her belief about what is true changes.

I have so much respect for your time, Richard so I don’t email you too often.

All the best to you and Tracey!

Brian

Total Page Visits: 2802 - Today Page Visits: 1

One Response

  1. Good exchange, Brian. You have a tendency to be slightly dogmatic in expressing your views. Richard caught you
    doing that and gently chastised you for being a bit presumptuous. Most excellent in owning your mistake! I am proud
    of you for initiating the conversation and taking responsibility for your actions. I’m looking forward to the discussion
    next week although I do have a conflicting meeting and will attempt to attend both events.

    Keep up the great work. All the best, Schecky

    P. S.: Now that you have Dolan’s attention, you may want to follow up on my article that you posted and ask him about
    the one page leak: https://www.brianruhe.ca/whos-gonna-finally-talk-about-that-one-page-dolan-leak-by-rich-scheck/

SUBSCRIBE

Please donate
To support our work

FREE BOOK !

With a donation of $25 (US or Canadian) get a free book Contact Brian for details
brian@brianruhe.ca

See more donation options here

TOP POSTS

for website UFO and government 1

More Articles

Orwell